in Re Philip T. Pixler

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 26, 2018
Docket02-18-00181-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Philip T. Pixler (in Re Philip T. Pixler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Philip T. Pixler, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-18-00181-CV

In re Philip T. Pixler § Original Proceeding

§ From the 271st District Court

§ of Wise County (CV17-10-820)

§ July 26, 2018

§ Opinion by Justice Meier

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the petition for writ of mandamus filed by Relator

Philip T. Pixler and is of the opinion that relief should be denied in part and

conditionally granted in part.

We deny Philip T. Pixler’s petition insofar as he challenges the district

court’s subject-matter jurisdiction over the City’s claims for injunctive relief, to

recover civil penalties, and for violating the TUFTA.

We conditionally grant Philip T. Pixler’s petition insofar as he challenges

the district court’s subject-matter jurisdiction over the City’s claim to enforce the

administrative penalties. Accordingly, we direct the district court to set aside only the portion of its March 27, 2018 “Summary Judgment Order and Permanent

Injunction” in which it ordered “that, pursuant to Texas Local Government Code

§ 54.044, the [City] is entitled to enforcement of the administrative penalties

assessed against [Pixler] totaling $8,000.” A writ will issue only if the district

court fails to do so.1

This Court’s June 5, 2018 order staying the trial court proceedings in

cause number CV17-10-820, styled City of Newark, William Andrew Messer,

Mack Reinwand, Ashley D. McSwain, Rene Culp, Pamela Thompson, Taylor

Burton, and Jeanine M. Inman v. Philip T. Pixler, pending in the 271st District

Court of Wise County, Texas, is hereby lifted.

It is further ordered that relator Philip T. Pixler shall pay one-half of the

costs of this proceeding and that real party in interest City of Newark shall pay

one-half of the costs of this proceeding, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier Justice Bill Meier

1 We deny Pixler’s request to sanction the City in the amount of $80,000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 54.044
Texas LG § 54.044

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Philip T. Pixler, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-philip-t-pixler-texapp-2018.