In Re Philip M. Ross v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 1, 2023·No. 04-23-00125-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-00125-CV

IN RE Philip M. ROSS

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 1, 2023

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On February 14, 2023, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus containing a request

for stay. After considering the petition and this record, this court concludes relator is not entitled

to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a). Relator’s request for stay is denied as moot.

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020-CI-05671, styled Commission for Lawyer Discipline v. Philip Martin Ross, pending in the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Stacey L. Mathews presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Philip M. Ross v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

In Re Philip M. Ross v. the State of Texas (In Re Philip M. Ross v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.