in Re Philip M. Ross

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 17, 2023·No. 04-23-00125-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 17, 2023

No. 04-23-00125-CV

IN RE Philip M. ROSS

Original Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

On February 14, 2023, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus containing a request for stay. After considering the petition and this record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relator’s request for stay is DENIED as moot.2

It is so ORDERED on February 17, 2023.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020-CI-05671, styled Commission for Lawyer Discipline v. Philip Martin Ross, pending in the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Stacey L. Mathews presiding. 2 Opinion to follow.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Philip M. Ross, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

in Re Philip M. Ross (in Re Philip M. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.