in Re Philip M. Ross
This text of in Re Philip M. Ross (in Re Philip M. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 17, 2023
No. 04-23-00125-CV
IN RE Philip M. ROSS
Original Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
On February 14, 2023, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus containing a request for stay. After considering the petition and this record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relator’s request for stay is DENIED as moot.2
It is so ORDERED on February 17, 2023.
PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO: ________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020-CI-05671, styled Commission for Lawyer Discipline v. Philip Martin Ross, pending in the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Stacey L. Mathews presiding. 2 Opinion to follow.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Philip M. Ross, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-philip-m-ross-texapp-2023.