In Re: P.G.F., Petition of: K.F.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 30, 2020·No. 58 WAL 2020 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: P.G.F : No. 58 WAL 2020 : :

PETITION OF: K.F., NATURAL FATHER : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of April, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Whether the trial court and the Superior Court erred in determining that the Guardian Ad Litem could act as both legal counsel for the child as well as “best interests” counsel for the minor child, when the child’s legal counsel failed to sufficiently inquire into the child’s preferred outcome of the proceedings?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: P.G.F., Petition of: K.F., (Pa. 2020).

In Re: P.G.F., Petition of: K.F. (In Re: P.G.F., Petition of: K.F.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.