In re Petrulla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Petrulla

230 A.D. 788

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 230 A.D. 788 (In re Petrulla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Petrulla, 230 A.D. 788 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Richmond county reversed upon the law and the facts and a new trial ordered before a jury on a framed issue, costs to appellant, payable out of the estate, to abide the event. The court is of opinion that the determination of the surrogate was against the weight of the evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper and Carswell, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., dissents and votes to affirm. Settle order before the presiding justice on two days’ notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Richmond county reversed upon the law and the facts and a new trial ordered before a jury on a framed issue, costs to appellant, payable out of the estate, to abide the event. The court is of opinion that the determination of the surrogate was against the weight of the evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper and Carswell, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., dissents and votes to affirm. Settle order before the presiding justice on two days’ notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 A.D. 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-petrulla-nyappdiv-1930.