In re Petrovic

Fourth Circuit

In re Petrovic

682 F. App'x 192

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 17, 2017·No. No. 17-1100·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jovica Petrovic petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant Petrovic leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jovica Petrovic petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant Petrovic leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

In re Petrovic, 682 F. App'x 192 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

682 F. App'x 192 (In re Petrovic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related