in Re: Petrona Del Carmen Valencia-De Rivas
This text of in Re: Petrona Del Carmen Valencia-De Rivas (in Re: Petrona Del Carmen Valencia-De Rivas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENY; and Opinion Filed May 6, 2019.
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00480-CV
IN RE PETRONA DEL CARMEN VALENCIA-DE RIVAS, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-10235
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Molberg In this original proceeding, relator complains of the trial court’s order denying relator’s
motion to disqualify the real party in interest Guadalupe Vielma Ramirez’s trial counsel.
“Mandamus is available where a motion to disqualify is inappropriately denied as there is no
adequate remedy on appeal.” In re Turner, 542 S.W.3d 553, 555 (Tex. 2017) (quoting In re
Columbia Valley Healthcare Sys., L.P., 320 S.W.3d 819, 824 n.2 (Tex. 2010) (orig. proceeding)).
We review a trial court’s refusal to disqualify a law firm under an abuse of discretion standard. Id.
Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown that the trial court abused
its discretion. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief
sought).
/Ken Molberg/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
190480F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Petrona Del Carmen Valencia-De Rivas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-petrona-del-carmen-valencia-de-rivas-texapp-2019.