in Re: Petrona Del Carmen Valencia-De Rivas
Opinion
DENY; and Opinion Filed May 6, 2019.
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00480-CV
IN RE PETRONA DEL CARMEN VALENCIA-DE RIVAS, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-10235
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Molberg In this original proceeding, relator complains of the trial court’s order denying relator’s
motion to disqualify the real party in interest Guadalupe Vielma Ramirez’s trial counsel. “Mandamus is available where a motion to disqualify is inappropriately denied as there is no adequate remedy on appeal.” In re Turner, 542 S.W.3d 553, 555 (Tex. 2017) (quoting In re Columbia Valley Healthcare Sys., L.P., 320 S.W.3d 819, 824 n.2 (Tex. 2010) (orig. proceeding)). We review a trial court’s refusal to disqualify a law firm under an abuse of discretion standard. Id.
Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown that the trial court abused its discretion. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).
/Ken Molberg/
KEN MOLBERG
JUSTICE
190480F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: Petrona Del Carmen Valencia-De Rivas (in Re: Petrona Del Carmen Valencia-De Rivas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.