In Re Petition Purporting to Nominate Hylan

193 N.E. 342, 265 N.Y. 607, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1206
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 31, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 193 N.E. 342 (In Re Petition Purporting to Nominate Hylan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Petition Purporting to Nominate Hylan, 193 N.E. 342, 265 N.Y. 607, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1206 (N.Y. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Considering the fact that this is a summary proceeding, where prompt action is necessary, we find no question of law is presented which requires reversal. (Election Law [Cons. Laws, ch. 17], §§ 330, 335.)

The Supreme Court made such order as justice may require,” within the contemplation of the Election Law. (§ 330.) To order a new trial at this time for technical errors not affecting substantial rights would be a futility.

The order should be affirmed.

Pound, Ch. J., Crane, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch and Loughran, JJ., concur; Lehman, J., not sitting..

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hunt v. Superior Court Ex Rel. Navajo County
170 P.2d 293 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1946)
In re Connell
260 A.D. 893 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 N.E. 342, 265 N.Y. 607, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 1206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-petition-purporting-to-nominate-hylan-ny-1934.