In Re: Petition of Retired Judge Farley Toothman
This text of In Re: Petition of Retired Judge Farley Toothman (In Re: Petition of Retired Judge Farley Toothman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
IN RE: PETITION OF RETIRED JUDGE : No. 78 EM 2021 FARLEY TOOTHMAN : : : PETITION OF: FARLEY TOOTHMAN :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 6th day of December, 2021, the “Petition for Allowance of a
Subpoena,” seeking this Court’s permission to subpoena the Honorable Gerald R.
Solomon pursuant to Rule of Judicial Administration 1701, is DISMISSED.
Rule 1701 specifies that, “[f]or purposes of this rule, judge and magisterial district
judge includes those judicial officers in active judicial service or senior status.” Pa.R.J.A.
1701(a). This provision has no apparent application to a subpoena that would be issued
on Judge Solomon, as that jurist’s term as a senior judge expired on December 31, 2020.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Petition of Retired Judge Farley Toothman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-petition-of-retired-judge-farley-toothman-pa-2021.