In Re Petition of Keogh-Dwyer
257 A.2d 697, 54 N.J. 523, 1969 N.J. LEXIS 221
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons given by the trial court. Ho costs in any Court.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Prancis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 7.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Petition of Keogh-Dwyer, 257 A.2d 697, 54 N.J. 523, 1969 N.J. LEXIS 221 (N.J. 1969).
257 A.2d 697 (In Re Petition of Keogh-Dwyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
KHALFANI v. WAY
D. New Jersey, 2024
Murphy v. State Canvassing Board
12 P.3d 677 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2000)
Fulbrook v. Reynolds
698 A.2d 564 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1997)
Beaudoin v. Belmar Tavern Owners Ass'n
523 A.2d 256 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1987)
Highton v. Musto
452 A.2d 487 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1982)
State v. Musto
454 A.2d 449 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1982)
Seligson v. De Bruin
415 A.2d 375 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1980)
Neil v. Klein
358 A.2d 488 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
Riecker v. Hartmann
326 A.2d 101 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1974)
In Re Petition of Fifteen Registered Voters, Cty. of Sussex
323 A.2d 521 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1974)
Cavanagh v. MORRIS CTY. DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
297 A.2d 594 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1972)
Alongi v. Schatzman
274 A.2d 33 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1971)