In re Petition of Grindling
This text of In re Petition of Grindling (In re Petition of Grindling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-12-0000473 17-MAY-2012 02:38 PM
NO. SCPW-12-0000473 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF CHRIS GRINDING
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)
Upon consideration of petitioner Chris Grindling’s
petition for an extraordinary writ filed on May 9, 2012, it
appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and
indisputable right to relief. Therefore, petitioner is not
entitled to extraordinary relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i
200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (An extraordinary writ will
not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and
indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to
redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested
action.). Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate
court shall process the petition for an extraordinary writ
without payment of the filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for an
extraordinary writ is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 17, 2012.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re Petition of Grindling, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-petition-of-grindling-haw-2012.