In re Petition of G.A.P. R.S.

124 A.3d 645, 2015 D.C. App. LEXIS 457
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 8, 2015
Docket14-FS-1310
StatusPublished

This text of 124 A.3d 645 (In re Petition of G.A.P. R.S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Petition of G.A.P. R.S., 124 A.3d 645, 2015 D.C. App. LEXIS 457 (D.C. 2015).

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the joint motion for summary affirmance filed 'by G.A.P. and the minor child’s guardian ad litem, appellant’s brief and appendix, and the record on appeal, it is

ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance is denied. See Oliver T. Carr Mgmt., Inc. v. Nat’l Delicatessen, Inc., 397 A.2d 914, 915 (D.C.1979). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the brief of each appellee, or a statement that the party will not be filing a brief, shall be filed within thirty days from the date of this order and the reply brief of appellant, if any, shall be filed no later than fifteen days thereafter. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that this appeal shall be placed on the court’s calendar for consideration during the month of January 2016. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that any requests for extensions of time will be looked upon with disfavor and will be granted only upon a showing of good cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chapman v. California
386 U.S. 18 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Oliver T. Carr Management, Inc. v. National Delicatessen, Inc.
397 A.2d 914 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1979)
In re: Petition of J.J. T.R.
111 A.3d 1038 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2015)
Watson v. United States
73 A.3d 130 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 A.3d 645, 2015 D.C. App. LEXIS 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-petition-of-gap-rs-dc-2015.