In Re Petition of Florida Bar

589 So. 2d 818, 1991 WL 239342
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 9, 1991
Docket76669
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 589 So. 2d 818 (In Re Petition of Florida Bar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Petition of Florida Bar, 589 So. 2d 818, 1991 WL 239342 (Fla. 1991).

Opinion

589 So.2d 818 (1991)

In re PETITION of THE FLORIDA BAR TO AMEND THE FLORIDA RULES OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE.

No. 76669.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 9, 1991.

Jeanne D. Howard, Chairman, West Palm Beach, Daniel Dawson, Vice Chairman, Orlando, and John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, of The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, for petitioner, The Juvenile Court Rules Committee.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, and Ward L. Metzger, Asst. Public Defender, Juvenile Court Coordinator, Jacksonville, and Anthony C. Musto, Chairman, Florida Rules of Judicial Admin. Committee, Coral Gables, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

In connection with The Florida Bar re Advisory Opinion HRS Nonlawyer Counselor, 547 So.2d 909 (Fla. 1989), and In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure (HRS Unlicensed Practice of Law), 557 So.2d 1360 (Fla. 1990), this Court gave permission to the Florida Bar Juvenile Court Rules Committee to revise the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure outside the four-year cycle for rules revision. The proposed amendments reflect statutory changes through the 1990 legislative session. The Court has received comments and suggestions from the Jacksonville Public Defender regarding the delinquency rules and from the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration Committee regarding use of certified court reporters. The juvenile rules committee considered the public defender's suggestions and agreed with some and disagreed with others.

After considering the juvenile rules committee's proposed amendments and the suggestions received from others, the Court adopts the committee's proposals. Therefore, the rules of juvenile procedure are amended as set out following this opinion. The amended rules will be effective at 12:01 a.m., July 1, 1991.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, BARKETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

PART I. DELINQUENCY PROCEEDINGS

A. INTRODUCTORY RULES

RULE 8.010000. SCOPE AND PURPOSE

These rules shall govern the procedures in the Ccircuit Ccourt in the exercise of its jurisdiction under the Florida Juvenile Justice Act.

They are intended to provide a just, speedy, and efficient determination of the procedures covered by them and shall be construed to secure simplicity in procedure and fairness in administration.

They shall be known as the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure and may be cited as Fla.R.Juv.P.

When appropriate the use of singular nouns and pronouns shall be construed to include the plural and the use of plural nouns and pronouns shall be construed to include the singular. The use of male pronouns shall be construed in the universal sense of both male and female.

Committee Note: All rules have been edited for style and to remove gender-bias. The rules have been reorganized and renumbered to correspond to the types and stages of juvenile proceedings. Cross-references have been changed accordingly.

RULE 8.020 [RESERVED]

B. PRELIMINARY PROCEEDINGS

RULE 8.030005. ORDERING CHILDREN INTO CUSTODY

Initial paragraph [No change]

(a) Bbe in writing;

(b) Sspecify the name and address of the child or, if unknown, designate him the child by any name or description by which he the child can be identified with reasonable certainty;

*819 (c) Sspecify the age and sex of the child; or, if his the child's age is unknown, that he or she is believed to be of an age subject to the jurisdiction of the circuit court as a juvenile case;

(d) Sstate the reasons why the child is being taken into custody;

(e) Oorder that the child be brought immediately before the court or be taken to a place of detention designated by the court to be detained pending a detention hearing;

(f) Sstate the date when issued, and the county and court where issued; and

(g) Bbe signed by the judge court with the title of his office.

RULE 8.050010. DETENTION HEARING

(a) When Required. No detention order provided for in Rrule 8.04013 shall be entered without a hearing at which all parties shall have an opportunity to be heard on the necessity for the child's being held in detention, unless the court finds that the parent or custodian cannot be located or that the child's mental or physical condition is such that a court appearance is not in his the child's best interest.

(b) — (e) [No change]

(1) Tthe nature of the charge for which he or she was taken into custody.;

(2) His the right to be represented by counsel and if insolvent the right to appointed counsel.;

(3) Tthat he the child is not required to say anything and that anything he says said may be used against him or her.;

(4) Iif his the child's parent, custodian, or counsel is not present, that he or she has a right to communicate with them and that, if necessary, reasonable means will be provided for him to do so.; and

(5) Tthe reason continued detention is requested.

(f) [No change]

(g) Probable Cause. If the court finds that such probable cause exists, it shall enter an order making such a finding and may, if other statutory needs of detention exist, retain the child in detention. If the court finds that such probable cause does not exist, it shall forthwith release the child from detention. If the court finds that one or more of the statutory needs of detention exists, but is unable to make a finding on the existence of probable cause, it may retain the child in detention and continue the hearing for the purpose of determining the existence of probable cause to a time within seventy-two (72) hours of the time the child was taken into custody. The court may, on a showing of good cause, continue the hearing a second time for not more than twenty-four (24) hours beyond the seventy-two (72) hour 72-hour period. Release of the child based on no probable cause existing shall not prohibit the filing of a petition and further proceedings thereunder, but shall prohibit the holding of the child in detention prior to an adjudicatory hearing.

RULE 8.040013. DETENTION PETITION AND ORDER

(a) Time Limitation. No child taken into custody shall be detained, as a result of the incident for which he is taken into custody, longer than twenty-four hours as provided by law unless a detention order so directing is made by the judge court following a detention hearing.

(b) Petition. The detention petition shall:

(1) Bbe in writing and be filed with the court;

(2) Sstate the name and address of the child or, if unknown, designate him the child by any name or description by which he or she can be identified with reasonable certainty;

(3) Sstate the age and sex of the child; or, if his the age is unknown, that he the child is believed to be of an age which will make him or her subject to the procedures covered by these rules;

(4) Sstate the reasons why the child is in custody and needs to be detained;

(5) Rrecommend the place where the child is to be detained or the agency to be responsible for the detention; and

(6) Bbe signed by an authorized agent of the Department of Health and Rehabilitative *820 Services or by the state attorney or assistant state attorney.

(c) Order. The detention order shall:

(1) Bbe in writing;

(2) Sstate the name and address of the child or, if unknown, designate him the child by any name or description by which he or she can be identified with reasonable certainty;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

L.M.B. v. Department of Children & Families
28 So. 3d 217 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
State v. SP
24 So. 3d 756 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
C.D. v. State
865 So. 2d 605 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Dixie Ins. Co. v. Mooneyhan
684 So. 2d 574 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1996)
T.Y. v. State
660 So. 2d 771 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
S.H. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services
642 So. 2d 809 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
In Interest of SH
642 So. 2d 809 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
May v. State
623 So. 2d 601 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
M.L.B. v. State
604 So. 2d 1257 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
RJA v. Foster
603 So. 2d 1167 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. State
599 So. 2d 123 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
DHRS v. State
599 So. 2d 123 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
E.T. v. State
587 So. 2d 615 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
589 So. 2d 818, 1991 WL 239342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-petition-of-florida-bar-fla-1991.