In Re Petition of Dispute Resolution Rules

31 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 295, 931 So. 2d 877
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 11, 2006
DocketSC05-998
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 31 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 295 (In Re Petition of Dispute Resolution Rules) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Petition of Dispute Resolution Rules, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 295, 931 So. 2d 877 (Fla. 2006).

Opinion

931 So.2d 877 (2006)

In re PETITION OF THE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION RULES AND POLICY COMMITTEE ON AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES FOR CERTIFIED AND COURT-APPOINTED MEDIATORS.

No. SC05-998.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 11, 2006.

Honorable Shawn L. Briese, Chair, Alternative Dispute Resolution Rules and *878 Policy Committee, Daytona Beach, FL, for Petitioner.

Larry Fong, President, Association for Conflict Resolution, Washington, D.C., Honorable Barbara L. Rutberg, West Palm Beach, FL, Linda Fieldstone, President, Florida Association of Family and Conciliation Courts, Naples, FL, Kenneth R. Hart of Ausley and McMullen, Florida Institute of Public Accounts ("FICPA"), Tallahassee, FL, Martin G. Holleran, Stuart, Florida, John W. Day, P.A., St. Petersburg, FL, Jayne M. Lambert, Tampa, FL, and Merrett R. Stierheim and Associates, Miami, FL, Responding with comments.

PER CURIAM.

The Supreme Court Committee on Alternative Dispute Resolution Rules and Policy (Committee) has filed a petition with the Court proposing amendments to the Florida Rules for Certified and Court-Appointed Mediators.[1] With the modifications discussed below, we adopt the proposed amendments, the most significant of which replaces the current mediator certification requirements contained in rule 10.100 with a new certification requirements "point system," outlined in the attached administrative order. The new point system, which we have modified as explained below, was proposed by the Committee in order to provide applicants with more flexibility in obtaining certification and to increase the diversity of the mediation profession in Florida.

BACKGROUND

The Committee[2] filed its proposals in response to a charge to its predecessor, the Committee on Alternative Dispute Resolution Rules, to undertake a review of the qualifications for mediator certification and to make recommendations to the Court regarding amendments to the Rules for Certified and Court-Appointed Mediators.[3] The proposed rule amendments can be classified into three different areas: Mediator Qualifications (Fla. R. Med.10.100-10.130), Standards of Professional Conduct (Fla. R. Med. 10.360, 10.370 and 10.420), and Discipline (Fla. R. Med.10.800-10.880).[4] The Committee also submits an administrative order to be issued by the Chief Justice in conjunction with the issuance of this opinion amending the rules. As relevant here, the administrative order outlines a new mediator certification requirements "point system" and replaces the current administrative order governing certification of mediators. See In re Rules Governing Certification of Mediators, Fla. Admin. Order No. AOSC00-8 (April 11, 2000) (on file with Clerk, Fla. Sup.Ct.).

*879 Prior to being submitted to the Court, the Committee's proposals were twice published for comment in The Resolution Report, which is sent to all persons who have completed a Supreme Court certified mediation training program. The proposals also were presented at the Dispute Resolution Center's 2004 Conference for Mediators and Arbitrators. Over sixty comments were received and considered by the Committee before it unanimously approved the proposal creating the new mediator certification point system.

After the Committee's proposals were filed with the Court, the proposals were published for comment in The Florida Bar News. Several comments were received by the Court. The Court also held oral argument on the proposals, where it heard from the Chair of the Committee. After considering the Committee's petition and the comments filed, and hearing from the Committee Chair, we adopt the proposed amendments to the Florida Rules for Certified and Court-Appointed Mediators, with the modifications discussed below. We also approve, on an interim basis as explained below, the new mediator certification requirements point system as modified for circuit court mediators and outlined in administrative order In re Rules Governing Certification of Mediators, Fla. Admin. Order No. AOSC06-9 (May 11, 2006), which is contained in appendix B to this opinion.

DISCUSSION

Currently the rules governing certification of mediators are contained in the Florida Rules for Certified and Court-Appointed Mediators and the administrative order In re Rules Governing Certification of Mediators, Fla. Admin. Order No. AOSC00-8 (April 11, 2000) (on file with Clerk, Fla. Sup.Ct.). See also In re Mediation Training Standards and Procedures, Fla. Admin. Order No. AOSC00-9 (April 11, 2000) (on file with Clerk, Fla. Sup.Ct.). The rules address mediator qualifications, standards of professional conduct, and discipline. Administrative order AOSC00-8, which administrative order AOSC06-9 replaces, addresses certification and renewal procedures, fees, mentorship requirements, immunity and confidentiality, and continuing mediator education.

The amendments to the rules are discussed below according to topic—Mediator Qualifications; Standards of Professional Conduct; and Discipline. We address Section I.B. of the new administrative order[5] along with the amendments to rule 10.100, Certification Requirements, because the new point system for mediator certification is outlined in that section of the administrative order rather than in the amended rule.

Mediator Qualifications

Rule 10.100, Certification Requirements; New Point System

New subdivision (a), General, of rule 10.100 retains the current good moral character certification requirement and adds a minimum age requirement of 21. As amended, the subdivisions of rule 10.100 that address the specific requirements for the various categories of certified mediators (county court, family, circuit court, dependency) provide that an applicant must satisfy the requirements contained in the administrative order issued by the Chief Justice. The new point-based requirements outlined in the administrative order are designed to replace the current *880 mandatory education/profession-based requirements contained in the rule with a more flexible point system based on training, education/experience, and mentorship.[6] Initially, before discussing their substance, we determine that the certification requirements should remain in the rules.

Section I.B, Certification Requirements, of administrative order AOSC06-9 outlines the new point system for each category of mediator.[7] The point requirement for each category of mediator (county, family, circuit, and dependency) is set at 100 points. Any applicant meeting the rule 10.100(a) requirements of good moral character and minimum age must obtain a total of 100 points in the areas of mediation training, education/mediation experience, mentorship, and miscellaneous activities, as outlined for each category of mediator.[8] According to the petition, the practical effect of this new point system is to remove the more formal mandatory education and profession-based requirements, for example, the current requirement for a family mediator of a masters, doctorate, medical, or law degree, or certified public accountant license, and to allow applicants to obtain certification in a variety of different ways more directly related to the actual skills and experience the Committee has determined to be necessary for service as an effective mediator.

We support the new point system in concept and can foresee no drawback to moving to a more practical and non-profession-based point system for certified county court, family, and dependency mediators.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 295, 931 So. 2d 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-petition-of-dispute-resolution-rules-fla-2006.