In Re Petition for REINSTATEMENT OF Christopher C. GREENMAN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0349719

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In Re Petition for REINSTATEMENT OF Christopher C. GREENMAN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0349719

860 N.W.2d 347

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMarch 11, 2015

DocketA14-1035

StatusPublished

This text of 860 N.W.2d 347 (In Re Petition for REINSTATEMENT OF Christopher C. GREENMAN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0349719) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Petition for REINSTATEMENT OF Christopher C. GREENMAN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0349719, 860 N.W.2d 347 (Mich. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Petitioner Christopher Charles Green-man was admitted to practice law in the State of Minnesota in 2005. In September 2011, petitioner voluntarily resigned from the practice of law in Minnesota. On June 19, 2014, petitioner filed a petition for reinstatement to the practice of law in Minnesota pursuant tó Rule 18(a), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility investigated the matter and reported his conclusions to a panel of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board, pursuant to Rule 18(b), RLPR.

After considering the written submissions of the parties, the panel found that petitioner has proven by clear and convincing evidence his ethical fitness and competence to practice law and has met all of the conditions for reinstatement.

We have independently reviewed the file and approve the panel’s recommendation,

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner Christopher Charles Greenman is reinstated to the practice of law, subject to payment of the applicable registration fee under Rule 2, Rules of the Supreme Court on Lawyer Registration.

BY THE COURT:

/s/_

Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Petitioner Christopher Charles Green-man was admitted to practice law in the State of Minnesota in 2005. In September 2011, petitioner voluntarily resigned from the practice of law in Minnesota. On June 19, 2014, petitioner filed a petition for reinstatement to the practice of law in Minnesota pursuant tó Rule 18(a), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility investigated the matter and reported his conclusions to a panel of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board, pursuant to Rule 18(b), RLPR.

After considering the written submissions of the parties, the panel found that petitioner has proven by clear and convincing evidence his ethical fitness and competence to practice law and has met all of the conditions for reinstatement.

We have independently reviewed the file and approve the panel’s recommendation,

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner Christopher Charles Greenman is reinstated to the practice of law, subject to payment of the applicable registration fee under Rule 2, Rules of the Supreme Court on Lawyer Registration.

BY THE COURT:

/s/_

Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

860 N.W.2d 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-petition-for-reinstatement-of-christopher-c-greenman-a-minnesota-minn-2015.