In re Petition for Disciplinary Action of Schmidt

413 N.W.2d 502, 1987 Minn. LEXIS 825
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided September 10, 1987·No. No. C8-86-177·Published

Opinion

ORDER

WHEREAS, this court did by order dated March 20, 1987, publicly reprimand the respondent Douglas E. Schmidt and suspend him from the practice of law for a period of six months thereafter, and

WHEREAS, the order of public reprimand and suspension provided that respondent comply with Rule 26, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, and

WHEREAS, the respondent has furnished to this court proof that he has complied with Rule 26, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, and has paid costs and disbursements of the original disciplinary proceeding,

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED:

That respondent Douglas E. Schmidt is hereby reinstated to the unrestricted practice of law in the State of Minnesota effective September 20, 1987.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action of Schmidt, 413 N.W.2d 502, 1987 Minn. LEXIS 825 (Mich. 1987).

413 N.W.2d 502 (In re Petition for Disciplinary Action of Schmidt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.