In re Petition for Disciplinary Action of Schmidt

413 N.W.2d 502, 1987 Minn. LEXIS 825
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedSeptember 10, 1987
DocketNo. C8-86-177
StatusPublished

This text of 413 N.W.2d 502 (In re Petition for Disciplinary Action of Schmidt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action of Schmidt, 413 N.W.2d 502, 1987 Minn. LEXIS 825 (Mich. 1987).

Opinion

ORDER

WHEREAS, this court did by order dated March 20, 1987, publicly reprimand the respondent Douglas E. Schmidt and suspend him from the practice of law for a period of six months thereafter, and

WHEREAS, the order of public reprimand and suspension provided that respondent comply with Rule 26, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, and

WHEREAS, the respondent has furnished to this court proof that he has complied with Rule 26, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, and has paid costs and disbursements of the original disciplinary proceeding,

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED:

That respondent Douglas E. Schmidt is hereby reinstated to the unrestricted practice of law in the State of Minnesota effective September 20, 1987.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
413 N.W.2d 502, 1987 Minn. LEXIS 825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-petition-for-disciplinary-action-of-schmidt-minn-1987.