In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Todd Curtis Pearson
This text of 920 N.W.2d 838 (In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Todd Curtis Pearson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for revocation of probation and for further disciplinary action against respondent Todd Curtis Pearson. The Director has also filed an application for suspension under Rule 12(c)(1), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), based upon evidence that respondent cannot be found in the state to respond to the petition for disciplinary action.
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Todd Curtis Pearson is suspended from the practice of law. Within 1 year from the date of this order, respondent may move the court for vacation of this order of suspension and for leave to answer the petition for disciplinary action. See Rule 12(c)(1), RLPR. If respondent fails to appear in this matter within 1 year of the date of the filing of this order, the allegations in the petition for disciplinary action shall be deemed admitted.
/s/ ______________________________
David L. Lillehaug
Associate Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
920 N.W.2d 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-petition-for-disciplinary-action-against-todd-curtis-pearson-minn-2018.