In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Simonson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Simonson

336 N.W.2d 255, 1983 Minn. LEXIS 1349

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJuly 12, 1983

DocketNo. CO-82-1654

StatusPublished

This text of 336 N.W.2d 255 (In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Simonson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Simonson, 336 N.W.2d 255, 1983 Minn. LEXIS 1349 (Mich. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

WHEREAS, a petition for Disciplinary Action has been filed by the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board in the above-entitled matter, and Answer thereto filed by PAUL L. SIMONSON,

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that this matter is herewith referred to the Honorable Bertrand Porit-sky, Judge of the Municipal Court of Ramsey County, Minnesota, for hearing, with directions to said referee to hear and report all evidence in said matter, and make and report his findings of fact in reference thereto to this Court and make such recommendations as he shall deem advisable and appropriate for the disposition of the above-entitled matter, in accordance with the rules of this Court in such case made and provided.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

WHEREAS, a petition for Disciplinary Action has been filed by the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board in the above-entitled matter, and Answer thereto filed by PAUL L. SIMONSON,

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that this matter is herewith referred to the Honorable Bertrand Porit-sky, Judge of the Municipal Court of Ramsey County, Minnesota, for hearing, with directions to said referee to hear and report all evidence in said matter, and make and report his findings of fact in reference thereto to this Court and make such recommendations as he shall deem advisable and appropriate for the disposition of the above-entitled matter, in accordance with the rules of this Court in such case made and provided.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

336 N.W.2d 255, 1983 Minn. LEXIS 1349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-petition-for-disciplinary-action-against-simonson-minn-1983.