In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Richard C. Mollin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Richard C. Mollin

910 N.W.2d 459

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedApril 20, 2018

DocketA17-1337

StatusPublished

This text of 910 N.W.2d 459 (In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Richard C. Mollin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Richard C. Mollin, 910 N.W.2d 459 (Mich. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

On January 24, 2018, we suspended respondent Richard C. Mollin, Jr. from the practice of law for a minimum of 60 days, effective February 7, 2018. Respondent has filed an affidavit seeking reinstatement in which he states that he has complied with the terms of the suspension order, except for successful completion of the written examination required for admission to the practice of law by the State Board of Law Examiners on the subject of professional responsibility. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility does not oppose the request.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Respondent Richard C. Mollin, Jr. is conditionally reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Minnesota, subject to his successful completion of the written examination required for admission to the practice of law by the State Board of Law Examiners on the subject of professional responsibility.

2. By January 24, 2019, respondent shall comply with Rule 18(e)(3), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), by filing with the Clerk of the Appellate Courts and serving upon the Director proof of respondent's successful completion of the written examination required for admission to the practice of law by the State Board of Law Examiners on the subject of professional responsibility. Failure to do so shall result in automatic re-suspension pending proof of successful completion of the examination, under Rule 18(e)(3), RLPR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On January 24, 2018, we suspended respondent Richard C. Mollin, Jr. from the practice of law for a minimum of 60 days, effective February 7, 2018. Respondent has filed an affidavit seeking reinstatement in which he states that he has complied with the terms of the suspension order, except for successful completion of the written examination required for admission to the practice of law by the State Board of Law Examiners on the subject of professional responsibility. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility does not oppose the request.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Respondent Richard C. Mollin, Jr. is conditionally reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Minnesota, subject to his successful completion of the written examination required for admission to the practice of law by the State Board of Law Examiners on the subject of professional responsibility.

2. By January 24, 2019, respondent shall comply with Rule 18(e)(3), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), by filing with the Clerk of the Appellate Courts and serving upon the Director proof of respondent's successful completion of the written examination required for admission to the practice of law by the State Board of Law Examiners on the subject of professional responsibility. Failure to do so shall result in automatic re-suspension pending proof of successful completion of the examination, under Rule 18(e)(3), RLPR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

910 N.W.2d 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-petition-for-disciplinary-action-against-richard-c-mollin-minn-2018.