In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Matthew Harvey JONES, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0286412

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Matthew Harvey JONES, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0286412

871 N.W.2d 568

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedNovember 25, 2015

DocketA14-504

StatusPublished

This text of 871 N.W.2d 568 (In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Matthew Harvey JONES, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0286412) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Matthew Harvey JONES, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0286412, 871 N.W.2d 568 (Mich. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed an amended and supplementary petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Matthew Harvey Jones committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline — namely, engaging in a pattern of neglect, inadequate client communication, failing to deposit client funds in trust, failing to promptly account for and return client property, sending false and misleading solicitations, making false statements to clients, failing to enter into appropriate written fee agreements, failing to deposit advance retainers into a trust account, failing to supervise nonlawyer assistants, sharing legal fees with a nonlawyer, knowingly depositing an insufficient funds instrument into his trust account resulting in an overdraft in the account, and failing to cooperate with the disciplinary system. See Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.3, 1.4, 1.4(a)(3), (a)(4), and (b), 1.5(b)(1) and (3), 1.15(a), (c)(3), (c)(4), and (c)(5), 1.16(d), *569 5.3(b) and (c), 5.4(a), 7.1, 7.3(b)(1) and (c), 8.1(b), and 8.4(c), and Rule 25, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR).

Respondent waives his rights under Rule 14, RLPR, withdraws his previously filed answer, unconditionally admits the allegations in the amended and supplementary petition, and with the Director recommends that the appropriate discipline is an indefinite suspension with no right to petition for reinstatement for 12 months.

The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the recommended disposition.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1.Respondent Matthew Harvey Jones is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law, effective 14 days from the date of the filing of this order, with no right to petition for reinstatement for 1 year.

2. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, RLPR (requiring notice of suspension to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals), and shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR.

3. Respondent may petition for reinstatement pursuant to Rule 18(a)-(d), RLPR. Reinstatement is conditioned on successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination and satisfaction of continuing legal education requirements pursuant to Rule 18(e), RLPR.

BY THE COURT:

/s/David R. Stras Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed an amended and supplementary petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Matthew Harvey Jones committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline — namely, engaging in a pattern of neglect, inadequate client communication, failing to deposit client funds in trust, failing to promptly account for and return client property, sending false and misleading solicitations, making false statements to clients, failing to enter into appropriate written fee agreements, failing to deposit advance retainers into a trust account, failing to supervise nonlawyer assistants, sharing legal fees with a nonlawyer, knowingly depositing an insufficient funds instrument into his trust account resulting in an overdraft in the account, and failing to cooperate with the disciplinary system. See Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.3, 1.4, 1.4(a)(3), (a)(4), and (b), 1.5(b)(1) and (3), 1.15(a), (c)(3), (c)(4), and (c)(5), 1.16(d), *569 5.3(b) and (c), 5.4(a), 7.1, 7.3(b)(1) and (c), 8.1(b), and 8.4(c), and Rule 25, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR).

Respondent waives his rights under Rule 14, RLPR, withdraws his previously filed answer, unconditionally admits the allegations in the amended and supplementary petition, and with the Director recommends that the appropriate discipline is an indefinite suspension with no right to petition for reinstatement for 12 months.

The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the recommended disposition.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1.Respondent Matthew Harvey Jones is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law, effective 14 days from the date of the filing of this order, with no right to petition for reinstatement for 1 year.

2. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, RLPR (requiring notice of suspension to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals), and shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR.

3. Respondent may petition for reinstatement pursuant to Rule 18(a)-(d), RLPR. Reinstatement is conditioned on successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination and satisfaction of continuing legal education requirements pursuant to Rule 18(e), RLPR.

BY THE COURT:

/s/David R. Stras Associate Justice

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

871 N.W.2d 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-petition-for-disciplinary-action-against-matthew-harvey-jones-a-minn-2015.