In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Marc G. Kurzman, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 59080.

874 N.W.2d 438, 2016 Minn. LEXIS 53
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedFebruary 3, 2016
DocketA14-1416
StatusPublished

This text of 874 N.W.2d 438 (In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Marc G. Kurzman, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 59080.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Marc G. Kurzman, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 59080., 874 N.W.2d 438, 2016 Minn. LEXIS 53 (Mich. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Mitchell Alan Robinson committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline — namely, failing to competently and diligently represent and communicate with a client in a criminal matter, see Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.1, 1.3, 1.4(a)(3) and 8.4(d); and failing to diligently represent and communicate with a client in an immigration matter, see Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.3,1.4(a)(2), and 1.4(a)(3).

Respondent now waives his procedural rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), withdraws his previously filed answer, and unconditionally admits the allegations in the petition. The parties jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a public reprimand and 2 years of unsupervised probation.

The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the recommended disposition.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, .

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

■ 1. Respondent Mitchell Alan Robinson is publicly reprimanded.

2. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR.

3. Respondent is placed on probation for 2 years, subject to the following conditions:

*439 (a).Respondent shall cooperate fully with the Director’s Office in its efforts to monitor compliance with this probation. Respondent shall promptly respond to the Director’s correspondence by its due date. Respondent shall provide the Director with a current mailing address and shall immediately notify the Director of any change of address. Respondent shall cooperate with the Director’s investigation of any allegations of unprofessional conduct that may come to the Director’s attention. Upon the Director’s request, respondent shall provide authorization for release of information and documentation to verify respondent’s compliance with the terms of this probation; and
(b) Respondent shall abide by the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct. - '

BY THE COURT:

/s/____ David R. Stras Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
874 N.W.2d 438, 2016 Minn. LEXIS 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-petition-for-disciplinary-action-against-marc-g-kurzman-a-minnesota-minn-2016.