In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Lieber
This text of 699 N.W.2d 722 (In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Lieber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action and a second amended and supplementary petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Daniel Martin Lieber has committed profession misconduct warranting public discipline. The referee conducted a hearing and filed his findings of fact, conclusion of law, and recommendation for discipline recommending that respondent be disbarred.
The referee found that respondent made improper financial advances to clients, charged the clients interest on the sums advanced at the rate of 15 percent per month, failed to disclose his conflict of interest in the transactions, lied about his involvement in the transactions both before and during the disciplinary investigation, made false statements under oath regarding his involvement in the transactions, ratified the false sworn testimony of one of his employees about one of the transactions, mishandled client funds held in his trust account by regularly making disbursements, primarily to clients, before depositing client funds to the accounts in support of those disbursements resulting in the temporary misappropriation of other clients’ funds to cover those disbursements, commingled personal and client funds in the trust account, failed to maintain proper books and records regarding funds held in trust, and falsely certified that he maintained the required trust ac-
count books and records, in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.7, 1.8(a), (e), and Cj), 1.15(a), (b), (c), and (h), 3.4(b), 4.1, 8.1(a)(3), and 8.4(a), (c), and (d).
Respondent has entered into a stipulation with the Director in which they stipulate that the referee’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are conclusive and they jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is immediate disbarment and payment of $900 in costs and disbursements pursuant to Rule 24, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility.
This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Daniel Martin Lieber is disbarred, effective immediately. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs and disbursements.
BY THE COURT:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
699 N.W.2d 722, 2005 Minn. LEXIS 378, 2005 WL 1580567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-petition-for-disciplinary-action-against-lieber-minn-2005.