In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST David Walter OLSON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0250326

886 N.W.2d 485, 2016 Minn. LEXIS 686, 2016 WL 6436323
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedOctober 18, 2016
DocketA16-1374
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 886 N.W.2d 485 (In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST David Walter OLSON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0250326) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST David Walter OLSON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0250326, 886 N.W.2d 485, 2016 Minn. LEXIS 686, 2016 WL 6436323 (Mich. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent David Walter Olson committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline—namely, engaging in sexual relations with a client. See Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.8(k) (2005).

Respondent waives his procedural rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyer Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and unconditionally admits the allegations in the petition. The parties jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a 60-day suspension.

The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the recommended disposition.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Respondent David Walter Olson is suspended from the practice of law for a minimum of 60 days, effective 14 days from the date of this order.

2. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, RLPR (requiring notice of suspension to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals).

3. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR.

4. Respondent shall be .eligible for reinstatement to the practice of law following the expiration of the suspension period provided that, not less than 15 days before the end of the suspension period, respondent files with the Clerk of the Appellate Courts.and serves upon the Director an affidavit establishing that he is current in continuing legal education requirements, has complied with Rules 24 and 26, RLPR, and has complied with any other conditions for reinstatement imposed by the court

5.Within 1 year of the date of the filing of this order, respondent shall file with the Clerk of the Appellate Courts and serve upon the Director proof of successful completion of the written examination required for admission to the practice of law by the State Board of Law Examiners on the subject of professional responsibility. Failure to timely file the required documentation shall result in automatic re-sus1 pension, as provided in Rule 18(e)(3), RLPR.

BY THE' COURT:

/s/David R. Stras Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Disciplinary Action Against Olson
903 N.W.2d 425 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2017)
In re Disciplinary Action Against Bulmer
899 N.W.2d 183 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
886 N.W.2d 485, 2016 Minn. LEXIS 686, 2016 WL 6436323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-petition-for-disciplinary-action-against-david-walter-olson-a-minn-2016.