In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Burns

430 N.W.2d 662, 1988 Minn. LEXIS 245, 1988 WL 114576
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedOctober 5, 1988
DocketNo. C7-88-1261
StatusPublished

This text of 430 N.W.2d 662 (In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Burns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Burns, 430 N.W.2d 662, 1988 Minn. LEXIS 245, 1988 WL 114576 (Mich. 1988).

Opinion

ORDER

WHEREAS, the matter of the discipline of Michael H. Bums came on for oral argument before this court on September 12, 1988; and

WHEREAS, during the course of the oral argument an agreement was reached, mutually acceptable to all the parties, to transfer Mr. Bums to disability inactive status under Rule 28 of the Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, should adequate proof of Mr. Bums’ mental illness be presented to the court; and

WHEREAS, such proof has been presented to the court in the form of letters from Mr. Burns’ consulting psychologist, Dr. Dick Jones, and Mr. Burns’ physician, W. Wyatt Moe, M.D., confirming that Mr. Bums suffers from depression to such extent that performance of his professional duties has become seriously impaired; and

WHEREAS, Rule 28, RLPR, requires that attorneys whose mental illness prevents the competent representation of clients be transferred to disability inactive status:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

(1) Mr. Bums be transferred to disability inactive status pursuant to Rule 28, RLPR, see In re Platto, 420 N.W.2d 217 (Minn. 1988); and

(2) Mr. Bums may not again practice law until he has made a showing to this court of his fitness to practice law pursuant to Rules 28(d) and 18, RLPR, and in such event Mr. Bums will not be entitled to the appointment of a lawyer under Rule 28(d), RLPR, see Platto, 420 N.W.2d at 217; and

(3) Mr. Bums may again practice upon a petition of the Director, Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board, pursuant to Rule 28(c), RLPR, in which event Mr. Burns’ right to appointment of counsel shall depend on the then existing rales, see In re Oldenkamp, 403 N.W.2d 617 (Minn. 1987).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Oldenkamp
403 N.W.2d 617 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1987)
In re Disciplinary Action Against Platto
420 N.W.2d 217 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
430 N.W.2d 662, 1988 Minn. LEXIS 245, 1988 WL 114576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-petition-for-disciplinary-action-against-burns-minn-1988.