In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Bradbury

430 N.W.2d 833, 1988 WL 114578
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided October 10, 1988·No. No. C8-88-894·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Following the filing of a petition alleging that the respondent Alan J. Bradbury had engaged in conduct meriting public discipline, the respondent and the Director of Lawyers Professional Responsibility have entered into a stipulation. In the stipulation the respondent has admitted that he pled guilty on July 19, 1988, in Ramsey County District Court to a charge of theft of over $2,500. He further admitted the allegations of the petition herein except that he only admitted to a misappropriation of at least $25,000. Respondent also agreed the court can impose, without further hearing or notice, any of the sanctions provided for by Rule 15(a)(l)-(9)> Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, has likewise waived all rights he has under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility to have the petition against

The court, having considered the petition herein, the stipulation, and attached documents NOW ORDERS:

1. That the respondent Alan J. Bradbury is hereby disbarred from the practice of law.

2. That the respondent Alan J. Bradbury shall pay to the Director of Lawyers Professional Responsibility as costs pursuant to Rule 24(a), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, the sum of $750.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Bradbury, 430 N.W.2d 833, 1988 WL 114578 (Mich. 1988).

430 N.W.2d 833 (In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Bradbury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.