In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Bradbury

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Bradbury

430 N.W.2d 833, 1988 WL 114578

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedOctober 10, 1988

DocketNo. C8-88-894

StatusPublished

This text of 430 N.W.2d 833 (In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Bradbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Bradbury, 430 N.W.2d 833, 1988 WL 114578 (Mich. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Following the filing of a petition alleging that the respondent Alan J. Bradbury had engaged in conduct meriting public discipline, the respondent and the Director of Lawyers Professional Responsibility have entered into a stipulation. In the stipulation the respondent has admitted that he pled guilty on July 19, 1988, in Ramsey County District Court to a charge of theft of over $2,500. He further admitted the allegations of the petition herein except that he only admitted to a misappropriation of at least $25,000. Respondent also agreed the court can impose, without further hearing or notice, any of the sanctions provided for by Rule 15(a)(l)-(9)> Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, has likewise waived all rights he has under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility to have the petition against

The court, having considered the petition herein, the stipulation, and attached documents NOW ORDERS:

1. That the respondent Alan J. Bradbury is hereby disbarred from the practice of law.

2. That the respondent Alan J. Bradbury shall pay to the Director of Lawyers Professional Responsibility as costs pursuant to Rule 24(a), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, the sum of $750.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Following the filing of a petition alleging that the respondent Alan J. Bradbury had engaged in conduct meriting public discipline, the respondent and the Director of Lawyers Professional Responsibility have entered into a stipulation. In the stipulation the respondent has admitted that he pled guilty on July 19, 1988, in Ramsey County District Court to a charge of theft of over $2,500. He further admitted the allegations of the petition herein except that he only admitted to a misappropriation of at least $25,000. Respondent also agreed the court can impose, without further hearing or notice, any of the sanctions provided for by Rule 15(a)(l)-(9)> Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, has likewise waived all rights he has under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility to have the petition against

The court, having considered the petition herein, the stipulation, and attached documents NOW ORDERS:

1. That the respondent Alan J. Bradbury is hereby disbarred from the practice of law.

2. That the respondent Alan J. Bradbury shall pay to the Director of Lawyers Professional Responsibility as costs pursuant to Rule 24(a), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, the sum of $750.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

430 N.W.2d 833, 1988 WL 114578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-petition-for-disciplinary-action-against-bradbury-minn-1988.