In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Arbeiter

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Arbeiter

764 N.W.2d 814, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 180, 2009 WL 1152016

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedApril 28, 2009

DocketA09-663

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 764 N.W.2d 814 (In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Arbeiter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Arbeiter, 764 N.W.2d 814, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 180, 2009 WL 1152016 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Sharon Elizabeth Arbeiter committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, forging a signature on an authorization for release of medical records and obtaining records pursuant to the authorization, in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(c) and (d). Respondent admits the allegations of the petition and waives her procedural rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). Respondent and the Director jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a public reprimand.

In cases of forgery, we typically impose some period of suspension from the practice of law. See, e.g., In re Yang, 755 N.W.2d 733, 734 (Minn.2008) (imposing suspension for a minimum of six months for forging signature of a party to a marital termination agreement). In support of the recommended discipline, the Director notes that upon receiving records pursuant to the forged authorization, respondent promptly informed her supervisor of her conduct, which may not otherwise have been discovered. In addition, respondent self-reported her misconduct to the Director. Finally, the Director notes that although admitted to practice law, respondent has never been engaged in the practice of law and the misconduct to which respondent admits occurred while respondent was working as a paralegal.

*815 The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Sharon Elizabeth Arbeiter is publicly reprimanded. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Sharon Elizabeth Arbeiter committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, forging a signature on an authorization for release of medical records and obtaining records pursuant to the authorization, in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(c) and (d). Respondent admits the allegations of the petition and waives her procedural rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). Respondent and the Director jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a public reprimand.

In cases of forgery, we typically impose some period of suspension from the practice of law. See, e.g., In re Yang, 755 N.W.2d 733, 734 (Minn.2008) (imposing suspension for a minimum of six months for forging signature of a party to a marital termination agreement). In support of the recommended discipline, the Director notes that upon receiving records pursuant to the forged authorization, respondent promptly informed her supervisor of her conduct, which may not otherwise have been discovered. In addition, respondent self-reported her misconduct to the Director. Finally, the Director notes that although admitted to practice law, respondent has never been engaged in the practice of law and the misconduct to which respondent admits occurred while respondent was working as a paralegal.

*815 The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Sharon Elizabeth Arbeiter is publicly reprimanded. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

764 N.W.2d 814, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 180, 2009 WL 1152016, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-petition-for-disciplinary-action-against-arbeiter-minn-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack