In re Petigara

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Petigara

206 A.3d 417, 237 N.J. 556

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 8, 2019·No. M-982 September Term 2018; 080457·Published

Opinion

This matter having been duly presented on the motion for reinstatement to the practice of law filed by Vishal S. Petigara of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2007, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since January 24, 2018, and the Office of Attorney Ethics having interposed no objection to the relief sought, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that Vishal S. Petigara be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that the restraints on respondent's attorney accounts ordered by the Court on January 24, 2018, are hereby vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This matter having been duly presented on the motion for reinstatement to the practice of law filed by Vishal S. Petigara of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2007, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since January 24, 2018, and the Office of Attorney Ethics having interposed no objection to the relief sought, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that Vishal S. Petigara be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that the restraints on respondent's attorney accounts ordered by the Court on January 24, 2018, are hereby vacated.

In re Petigara, 206 A.3d 417, 237 N.J. 556 (N.J. 2019).

Pincite

206 A.3d 417 (In re Petigara) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.