In re Peters

New York Supreme Court

In re Peters

3 Liquor Tax Rep. 39

DecidedAugust 28, 1902

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Liquor Tax Rep. 39 (In re Peters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Peters, 3 Liquor Tax Rep. 39 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

Giegerich, J.:

Although there are some differences and uncertainty in the testimony of the three witnesses for the petitioner in minor details, as might well be the case, a year having elapsed before they were called upon to testify, nevertheless they are positive and united on all essential and important points, such as they gave attention to and would be expected to remember. I am satisfied that on the Sundays stated intoxicating liquors were sold to the petitioner’s witnesses without meals. The petition should be granted -with costs.

Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Giegerich, J.:

Although there are some differences and uncertainty in the testimony of the three witnesses for the petitioner in minor details, as might well be the case, a year having elapsed before they were called upon to testify, nevertheless they are positive and united on all essential and important points, such as they gave attention to and would be expected to remember. I am satisfied that on the Sundays stated intoxicating liquors were sold to the petitioner’s witnesses without meals. The petition should be granted -with costs.

Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Liquor Tax Rep. 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-peters-nysupct-1902.