In re Peters

165 So. 3d 916, 2015 La. LEXIS 1112, 2015 WL 3369639
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 22, 2015·No. No. 2015-B-0775·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM.

| T Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which respondent acknowledges that he violated the following provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct: Rules 4.1(a), 8.4(a), 8.4(c), and 8.4(d). Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that John Roumain Peters, III, Louisiana Bar Roll number 21810, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months, fully deferred.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

CRICHTON, J., dissents and assigns reasons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Peters, 165 So. 3d 916, 2015 La. LEXIS 1112, 2015 WL 3369639 (La. 2015).

165 So. 3d 916 (In re Peters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Hardee
259 So. 3d 329 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2018)