In Re Peter Shaper v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Opinion issued January 23, 2025
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
in the underlying matter,” including an October 7, 2024 pre-trial conference and October 14, 2024 trial setting, pending the Court’s disposition of the petition for writ of mandamus.
On October 4, 2024, the Court granted relator’s motion for temporary relief, in part, staying the October 7, 2024 pre-trial conference and the October 14, 2024 trial setting. On December 3, 2024, counsel for relator notified the Court that the parties had reached a settlement agreement, and that after all settlement documents had been executed, relator would file a motion to dismiss this original proceeding.
On January 13, 2025, relator filed an “Unopposed Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Petition for Writ of Mandamus.” In the motion, relator stated that the parties had “fully executed [their] settlement, rendering this mandamus action unnecessary.” Accordingly, relator requested that the “Court dismiss this original proceeding.”
Relator’s motion includes a certificate of conference stating that real party in interest, Catherine E. Youngman, in her capacity as Class 3 Trustee for the Speedcast SFA Lenders’ Litigation Trust, is unopposed to the relief requested in relator’s motion to dismiss. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2).
Accordingly, we lift the stay imposed by our October 4, 2024 order, grant relator’s motion, and dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Caughey, and Morgan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Peter Shaper v. the State of Texas (In Re Peter Shaper v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.