IN RE PETER N. NJANG

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

IN RE PETER N. NJANG

154 A.3d 1182

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided March 2, 2017·No. 16-BG-1246·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the Board on Professional Responsibility’s Report and Recommendation, and this court’s December 27, 2016, order directing respondent to show cause why he should not be suspended pending final action on the Board’s report, and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Peter N. Njang is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia pending final disposition of this proceeding. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent’s attention is directed to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 relating to suspended attorneys and D.C. Bar R. XI, § 16 (c), dealing with the timing of eligibility for reinstatement as related to compliance with R. XI, § 14, including filing of the required affidavit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the Board on Professional Responsibility’s Report and Recommendation, and this court’s December 27, 2016, order directing respondent to show cause why he should not be suspended pending final action on the Board’s report, and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Peter N. Njang is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia pending final disposition of this proceeding. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent’s attention is directed to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 relating to suspended attorneys and D.C. Bar R. XI, § 16 (c), dealing with the timing of eligibility for reinstatement as related to compliance with R. XI, § 14, including filing of the required affidavit.

IN RE PETER N. NJANG, 154 A.3d 1182 (D.C. 2017).

Pincite

154 A.3d 1182 (IN RE PETER N. NJANG) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.