In re Peteet

993 N.E.2d 1137, 2013 WL 5172758, 2013 Ind. LEXIS 695
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 6, 2013
DocketNo. 45S00-1305-DI-302
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 993 N.E.2d 1137 (In re Peteet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Peteet, 993 N.E.2d 1137, 2013 WL 5172758, 2013 Ind. LEXIS 695 (Ind. 2013).

Opinion

PUBLISHED ORDER OF INTERIM SUSPENSION UPON NOTICE OF GUILTY FINDING

The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, pursuant to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 23(ll.l)(a), has filed a “Notice of Guilty Finding and Request for Suspension,” asking that Respondent be suspended from the practice of law in this State, pending further order of this Court or final resolution of any resulting disciplinary action, due to Respondent being found guilty of a crime punishable as a felony.

The Court, being duly advised and upon consideration of all materials submitted, now finds that Respondent has been found guilty of the following felonies under federal law: Racketeering and Attempt to Commit Murder in Aid of Racketeering Activity.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent is suspended from the practice of law in this State, effective immediately. Respondent is ordered to fulfill the duties of a suspended attorney under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(26). The interim suspension shall continue until further order of this Court or final resolution of any resulting disciplinary action, provided no other suspension is in effect.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to send notice of this Order to Respondent or Respondent’s attorney by certified or registered mail, to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, and to all other entities entitled to notice under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(3)(d). The Clerk is further directed to post this order to the Court’s website, and Thomson Reuters is directed to publish a copy of this order in the bound volumes of this Court’s decisions.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
993 N.E.2d 1137, 2013 WL 5172758, 2013 Ind. LEXIS 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-peteet-ind-2013.