In re Peruzzi
272 A.D.2d 925, 708 N.Y.S.2d 664, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5156
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 10, 2000
StatusPublished
This text of 272 A.D.2d 925 (In re Peruzzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Peruzzi, 272 A.D.2d 925, 708 N.Y.S.2d 664, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5156 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).
Opinion
—Order unanimously affirmed with costs for reasons stated in decision at Onondaga County Surrogate’s Court, Wells, S. (Appeal from Order of Onondaga County Surrogate’s Court, Wells, S. — EPTL.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
272 A.D.2d 925, 708 N.Y.S.2d 664, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-peruzzi-nyappdiv-2000.