In re Perry

252 A.D. 911

This text of 252 A.D. 911 (In re Perry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Perry, 252 A.D. 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court of Rensselaer county made on May 14, 1937, denying appellant’s motion to dismiss a petition that he account for moneys belonging to the estate of Helen B. Markham, deceased, received by him while acting as attorney for the administrator of that estate. The petition alleges that these moneys were delivered to the appellant by the administrator for the purpose of distribution, that the administrator is entitled to certain of these moneys as his distributive share of the estate and that the same have not been paid. The petitioner is the representative of the estate of the deceased administrator. Order affirmed. Hill, P. J., Rhodes and Bliss, JJ., concur; McNamee and Crapser, JJ., dissent, and vote to reverse the order, and to dismiss the petition, on the ground that the surrogate is without jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 A.D. 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-perry-nyappdiv-1937.