Home/California Court of Appeal/In re Perry

In re Perry

206 P.2d 652, 91 Cal. App. 2d 677, 1949 Cal. App. LEXIS 1285
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedMay 5, 1949
DocketCrim. No. 2594
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 206 P.2d 652 (In re Perry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Perry, 206 P.2d 652, 91 Cal. App. 2d 677, 1949 Cal. App. LEXIS 1285 (Cal. Ct. App. 1949).

Opinion

PETERS, P. J.

The writ of habeas corpus was issued on a petition averring that the prisoner was being held without a commitment. According to the record that has been filed, that averment, when made, was justified by the facts then in the knowledge of the attorney for the petitioner, but the record shows that in fact a commitment had been issued.

It appearing to the court that the trial court had jurisdiction of the person and the subject matter, and that a valid commitment had been issued, it is the order of the court that the writ of habeas corpus be discharged and the prisoner is remanded to custody.

Ward, J., and Bray, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perry v. Meikle
228 P.2d 17 (California Court of Appeal, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 P.2d 652, 91 Cal. App. 2d 677, 1949 Cal. App. LEXIS 1285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-perry-calctapp-1949.