In re Perrin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Perrin

182 So. 3d 942, 2016 La. LEXIS 22, 2016 WL 228157

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 8, 2016

DocketNo. 2015-B-2036

StatusPublished

This text of 182 So. 3d 942 (In re Perrin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Perrin, 182 So. 3d 942, 2016 La. LEXIS 22, 2016 WL 228157 (La. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

• ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM.

hThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent notarized documents outside the presence of the signatories. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Warren A. Perrin, Louisiana Bar Roll number 10498, be and he hereby is publicly reprimanded. -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

• ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM.

hThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent notarized documents outside the presence of the signatories. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Warren A. Perrin, Louisiana Bar Roll number 10498, be and he hereby is publicly reprimanded. -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 So. 3d 942, 2016 La. LEXIS 22, 2016 WL 228157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-perrin-la-2016.