In re Perrault's Estate

54 So. 939, 128 La. 453, 1911 La. LEXIS 584
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMarch 27, 1911
DocketNo. 18,552
StatusPublished
Cited by23 cases

This text of 54 So. 939 (In re Perrault's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Perrault's Estate, 54 So. 939, 128 La. 453, 1911 La. LEXIS 584 (La. 1911).

Opinion

PBOVOSTY, J.

The present suit is a rule taken by the executrix of the succession of Perrault on the defendant in rule, the St. Landry Bealty Company, Limited, to show cause why this company should not accept title to a tract of land of 1,186 acres, adjudicated to it at the sale of the property of said succession. One of the links in the chain of the title to 960 acres of the land is a tax sale, and defendant’s refusal to accept the title is because of its fear that the tax sale was invalid by reason of the insufficiency of the description of the land in the assessment upon which the sale was based.

The description was as follows:

“Heirs of C. L. and J. L. Williams, 960 acres, swamp land, in T. 6, B. 5 B., parish of St. Landry.”

This description, mentioning, as it does, only the township, would not have identified the land, and the tax sale would therefore have been null, if the tax debtors had had any other land in that township; but this 960-acre tract was all they had, hence this description, imperfect as it was, identified their land, since it applied to it and to none other, and was therefore sufficient. Weber’s Heirs v. Martinez, 125 La. 663, 51 South. [455]*455679, and cases there cited. The evidence shows that the purchaser at the tax sale had no difficulty in identifying the land, and that he and his successors in title have been in actual possession since the tax sale.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garrett v. Ernest
369 So. 2d 713 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1979)
Lambert v. Bond
102 So. 2d 467 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1958)
Quatre Parish Co. v. Beauregard Parish School Board
57 So. 2d 197 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1952)
Egle v. Constantin
5 So. 2d 281 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1941)
Jackson v. Irion
200 So. 18 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1941)
Tillery v. Fuller
182 So. 683 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1938)
Gayle v. Slicer
178 So. 498 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1938)
Goertz v. Menard
168 So. 747 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1936)
Brown v. Tauzin
163 So. 764 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1935)
Schultz v. Kellar
136 So. 220 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1931)
Close v. Rowan
130 So. 350 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1930)
Hargrove v. Hodge
121 So. 224 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1928)
Blanchard v. Estate of Hy Garland
6 La. App. 508 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1927)
Pierson v. Castell Land & Harbor Co.
105 So. 274 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1925)
Board of Com'rs v. Concordia Land & Timber Co.
74 So. 921 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1916)
Baldwin Lumber Co. v. Dalferes
70 So. 493 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1915)
Landry v. McWilliams
65 So. 875 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1914)
Purcell v. Seeger
10 Teiss. 308 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1913)
Abshire v. Lege
62 So. 667 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 So. 939, 128 La. 453, 1911 La. LEXIS 584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-perraults-estate-la-1911.