In Re Perone

37 A.3d 1137, 209 N.J. 422, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 294
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 9, 2012·No. D-62 September Term 2011·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11-289, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20—4(f) (default by respondent), that PATRICK N. PERONE of MANAHAWKIN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, should be censured for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) and RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of the matter), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that PATRICK N. PERONE is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Perone, 37 A.3d 1137, 209 N.J. 422, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 294 (N.J. 2012).

37 A.3d 1137 (In Re Perone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Deitch
37 A.3d 1137 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2012)