In re Perilloux

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Perilloux

875 So. 2d 66, 2004 La. LEXIS 1865, 2004 WL 1233845

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 4, 2004·No. No. 2004-B-1141·Published

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent notarized a document outside the presence of the signatory. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Elzey Jeffrey Perilloux, Louisiana Bar Roll number 22586, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent notarized a document outside the presence of the signatory. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Elzey Jeffrey Perilloux, Louisiana Bar Roll number 22586, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

In re Perilloux, 875 So. 2d 66, 2004 La. LEXIS 1865, 2004 WL 1233845 (La. 2004).

Pincite

875 So. 2d 66 (In re Perilloux) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.