In re People's Mail Steamship Co.

19 F. Cas. 211, 3 Ben. 226
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. New York
DecidedApril 15, 1869
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 19 F. Cas. 211 (In re People's Mail Steamship Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re People's Mail Steamship Co., 19 F. Cas. 211, 3 Ben. 226 (E.D.N.Y. 1869).

Opinion

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

In this case, the bankrupts were declared such on the 23d of January, 1869. An assignee was chosen on the 20th of February, 1809. The marshal of this district, under an order made by this court, on the 10th of January, 1869, under the 40th section of the bankruptcy act [of 1867 (14 Stat. 536)], took possessiou provisionally, on or about that day, of all the property of the bankrupts, including the steamship Emily B. Souder. On or immediately after the 20th of February, 1869, the deputy marshal who was in charge of that vessel gave up the keys of it, by direction of the marshal, to the assignee, and thereafter remained in charge of the vessel on behalf of the assignee. On the 3d of March, 1869, Joseph West and Thomas Nettleton filed a libel in rein in this court, in admiralty, against the said vessel, claiming $1,405.28 damages for a collision which occurred between her and the steamer Beaufort, on the Mississippi river, on the 27th of June, 186S. On this libel a monition was issued to the marshal, on the 3d of March, 1SC9, returnable on the 23d of the same month, commanding him to attach the vessel. To that monition the marshal made return, that he, on [212]*212the 3d of March, attached the vessel. The assignee now, on a petition setting forth these facts, and his possession of the vessel prior to such attaclient of her in the collision suit, piays for an injunction restraining the libellants in such suit from holding or attempting to hold the vessel, or doing any other act interfering with the property of the bankrupts in the hands of the assignee.

This injunction must be granted. The possession of the vessel by the assignee is the possession of her by the court. That possession cannot be lawfully disturbed or ousted by any person. If- the libellants in the collision suit have a lien on the vessel, created by the fact of the collision, which is entitled to be satisfied out of the vessel, in preference to the claims of creditors under the bankrupt proceedings, that lien, inasmuch as proceedings to enforce it were not commenced before this court took possession of the vessel for administration in those proceedings, can be enforced, so long as this court holds possession of the vessel, only by being submitted, by those claiming it, to the arbitrament of this court sitting in bankruptcy'. Harlan v. The Nassau [Case Nos. 6.066 and 6.067]; The Nassau, 4 Wall. [71 U. S.] 634, 642. If the libellants have, by virtue of the collision, or otherwise, a lien on the vessel, this court, sitting in bankruptcy, has full power, under section 1 of the bankruptcy act, to ascertain and liquidate such lien, on its being presented in proper form, by petition, to this court pitting in bankruptcy. The prayer of the petition is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eagle, Star & British Dominions v. Tadlock
14 F. Supp. 933 (S.D. California, 1936)
Hudson v. New York & A. Transp. Co.
175 F. 519 (S.D. New York, 1909)
Pratt v. Paris Gas Light & Coke Co.
168 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 F. Cas. 211, 3 Ben. 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-peoples-mail-steamship-co-nyed-1869.