In re People

235 A.D. 250, 256 N.Y.S. 561, 1932 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7935
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1932·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Sherman, J.

We are of opinion that the Superintendent of Insurance, acting as liquidator, is not to be deemed a receiver within the purview of section 151 of the Debtor and Creditor Law (as added by Laws of 1927, chap. 697). Respondent, therefore, had no right of setoff of its unmatured claim at the time when the demand was made on it for payment of the amount of the deposit and the check drawn upon the deposit account in such sum was presented. However, we are confronted by the controlling circumstance that there existed merely the relationship of debtor and creditor, so that a summary order directing the payment of the debt may not issue. (Matter of Delaney, 256 N. Y. 315.)

It follows, therefore, that the order appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Finch, P. J., McAvoy, Martin and Townley, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re People, 235 A.D. 250, 256 N.Y.S. 561, 1932 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7935 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

235 A.D. 250 (In re People) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Rinn
242 A.D. 523 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)
Van Schaick v. Pennsylvania Exchange Bank
236 A.D. 453 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)