in Re PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
Opinion
Deny and Opinion Filed January 19, 2022
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-01102-CV
IN RE PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC, Relator
Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-02785-C
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Partida-Kipness, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness
Before the Court are relator’s December 14, 2021 petition for writ of
mandamus and motion for emergency stay.
Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court
clearly abused its discretion and that he lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re
Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).
Based on our review of the petition, record, and response, we conclude
relator has failed to demonstrate an entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly,
we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
Page 1 of 2 We deny relator’s motion for emergency stay as moot.
/Robbie Partida-Kipness/ ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS JUSTICE
211102F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re PennyMac Loan Services, LLC (in Re PennyMac Loan Services, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.