In re Pennell
This text of 159 F. 500 (In re Pennell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After examining the papers in this case and hearing counsel, I have reached the conclusion that the restraining order of March 4, 1907, should be vacated so that the order of the New York City Court dated February 27, 1907, may have due effect. That court plainly had jurisdiction of the, proceedings in which the order was made. The order was based on an opinion by that court in which the conclusion was expressed that the bankrupt’s attorneys had a lien upon the judgment which the bankrupt had previously recovered against Kneeland & Kneeland. The proofs before me amply sustain the conclusion of that court.
An order may be presented to me vacating and setting aside the restraining order of March 4, 1907.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
159 F. 500, 1907 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pennell-njd-1907.