In re Pendergast

817 P.2d 659, 249 Kan. 306, 1991 Kan. LEXIS 217
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Pendergast. Read the opinion of the Court — 247 Kan. 322
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided September 30, 1991·No. No. 63,412·Published

Opinion

On July 14, 1989, this court placed respondent on probation for a period of one year with specific conditions of supervision, and appointed James E. (Jeb) Benfer III, Chairman of the Topeka Bar Association Impaired Lawyers Assistance Committee, to supervise respondent during his probation, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 206 (1990 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 141). In re Pendergast, 245 Kan. 312, 776 P.2d 1202 (1989).

On October 23, 1990, this court extended respondent’s probation on an unsupervised basis for a period of one year, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 203 (1990 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 137). In re Pendergast, 247 Kan. 322, 799 P.2d 474 (1990).

This court finds that the disciplinary administrator has filed a second report verifying that respondent has fully complied with all conditions imposed upon him by this court and recommending that respondent be discharged from probation.

It is therefore ordered that respondent is discharged from probation and from any further obligations in this matter and that this proceeding is closed.

It Is further ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports and that the costs herein be assessed to the respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Pendergast, 817 P.2d 659, 249 Kan. 306, 1991 Kan. LEXIS 217 (kan 1991).

817 P.2d 659 (In re Pendergast) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Matter of Pendergast
776 P.2d 1202 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1989)
In re Pendergast
799 P.2d 474 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1990)