In re Pelland

208 A.D.2d 71, 623 N.Y.S.2d 30, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2093

This text of 208 A.D.2d 71 (In re Pelland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Pelland, 208 A.D.2d 71, 623 N.Y.S.2d 30, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2093 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court on July 9, 1975 and, until his suspension, maintained an office for the practice of law in Syracuse. On May 19, 1994, respondent entered a plea of guilty in the United States District Court for [72]*72the Northern District of New York to the crime of fraudulently concealing assets from bankruptcy trustees in violation of 18 USC § 152. Inasmuch as the corresponding New York crime, fraud in insolvency (Penal Law § 185.00), is a class A misdemeanor, and because fraud is an element of that crime, this Court, on June 14, 1994, issued an order pursuant to Judiciary Law §90 (4) (f) suspending respondent pending further order of the Court and directing him to show cause, pursuant to Judiciary Law §90 (4) (g), why a final order of censure, suspension or disbarment should not be entered. On August 19, 1994, respondent was sentenced to a term of probation of one year, was fined $1,000 and was directed to make restitution of $1,000. Respondent appeared and submitted matters in mitigation and this Court, on August 1, 1994, referred the matter to the Grievance Committee for further investigation of the facts and circumstances surrounding the conviction. The Grievance Committee’s report indicated that respondent concealed assets from the bankruptcy trustees when he knowingly filed an affidavit containing false information in connection with an application for legal fees.

We have considered all of the circumstances surrounding respondent’s conviction, including the matters submitted in mitigation, and conclude that he should be suspended for one year, commencing June 14, 1994, and until further order of this Court.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Fallon and Doerr, JJ., concur.

Order of suspension entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 A.D.2d 71, 623 N.Y.S.2d 30, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pelland-nyappdiv-1995.