In re Peck

Monroe County Court

In re Peck

2 Liquor Tax Rep. 451

DecidedFebruary 15, 1901

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Liquor Tax Rep. 451 (In re Peck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Monroe County Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Peck, 2 Liquor Tax Rep. 451 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

H. Sutherland, Monroe Co., J.:

Held : That the evidence establishes an unlawful sale of liquor by an agent and employee of the respondent on his premises on Sunday, July 15th, and on Sunday, July 22, 1900, and that the petitioner is entitled to an order revoking and canceling the certificate with costs. Findings may be prepared by counsel for the petitioner, together with the final order, and submitted for settlement on two days’ notice to counsel for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

H. Sutherland, Monroe Co., J.:

Held : That the evidence establishes an unlawful sale of liquor by an agent and employee of the respondent on his premises on Sunday, July 15th, and on Sunday, July 22, 1900, and that the petitioner is entitled to an order revoking and canceling the certificate with costs. Findings may be prepared by counsel for the petitioner, together with the final order, and submitted for settlement on two days’ notice to counsel for respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Liquor Tax Rep. 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-peck-flactyct44-1901.