In re Pearson
593 S.E.2d 145, 357 S.C. 226, 2004 S.C. LEXIS 32
This text of 593 S.E.2d 145 (In re Pearson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Pearson, 593 S.E.2d 145, 357 S.C. 226, 2004 S.C. LEXIS 32 (S.C. 2004).
Opinion
ORDER
On August 25, 2003, Respondent was suspended for a period of 146 days. He has now filed an affidavit requesting reinstatement pursuant to Rule 32, of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.
The request is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state.
/s/JeanH. Toal, C.J.
FOR THE COURT
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
593 S.E.2d 145, 357 S.C. 226, 2004 S.C. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pearson-sc-2004.