In Re Pearman

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In Re Pearman

637 S.E.2d 309, 371 S.C. 19, 2006 S.C. LEXIS 348

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided November 3, 2006·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent has been charged with soliciting prostitution, in violation of S.C.Code Ann. § 16-15-90 (2003), and impersonating a law enforcement officer, in violation of S.C.Code Ann. 16-17-720 (2003). The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed *20 a petition asking the Court to place respondent on interim suspension, pursuant to Rule 17(a), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, because he has been charged with a serious crime.

, IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and respondent'is suspended, pursuant to Rule 17(a), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, from the practice of law in this State until further order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Respondent has been charged with soliciting prostitution, in violation of S.C.Code Ann. § 16-15-90 (2003), and impersonating a law enforcement officer, in violation of S.C.Code Ann. 16-17-720 (2003). The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed *20 a petition asking the Court to place respondent on interim suspension, pursuant to Rule 17(a), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, because he has been charged with a serious crime.

, IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and respondent'is suspended, pursuant to Rule 17(a), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, from the practice of law in this State until further order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J.

FOR THE COURT

In Re Pearman, 637 S.E.2d 309, 371 S.C. 19, 2006 S.C. LEXIS 348 (S.C. 2006).

Pincite

637 S.E.2d 309 (In Re Pearman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related