In Re Pearman

637 S.E.2d 309, 371 S.C. 19, 2006 S.C. LEXIS 348
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedNovember 3, 2006
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 637 S.E.2d 309 (In Re Pearman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Pearman, 637 S.E.2d 309, 371 S.C. 19, 2006 S.C. LEXIS 348 (S.C. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent has been charged with soliciting prostitution, in violation of S.C.Code Ann. § 16-15-90 (2003), and impersonating a law enforcement officer, in violation of S.C.Code Ann. 16-17-720 (2003). The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed *20 a petition asking the Court to place respondent on interim suspension, pursuant to Rule 17(a), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, because he has been charged with a serious crime.

, IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and respondent'is suspended, pursuant to Rule 17(a), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, from the practice of law in this State until further order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Matter of Partridge
637 S.E.2d 309 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
637 S.E.2d 309, 371 S.C. 19, 2006 S.C. LEXIS 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pearman-sc-2006.