In re Pazuhanich

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Pazuhanich

868 A.2d 1195

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 25, 2005

DocketNo. 893 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 868 A.2d 1195 (In re Pazuhanich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Pazuhanich, 868 A.2d 1195 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of February, 2005, a Rule having been entered by this Court on December 29, 2004, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Mark Peter Pazuhanich to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension, upon consideration of the response filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Mark Peter Pazuhanich is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of February, 2005, a Rule having been entered by this Court on December 29, 2004, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Mark Peter Pazuhanich to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension, upon consideration of the response filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Mark Peter Pazuhanich is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

868 A.2d 1195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pazuhanich-pa-2005.