In re Payton

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Payton

183 A.3d 946, 233 N.J. 205

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 3, 2018·No. D–23 September Term 2017; 080206·Published

Opinion

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 17-132, concluding that QUEEN E. PAYTON of **206MOUNT LAUREL , who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2001, should not be disciplined for violating RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21-6 (recordkeeping violations), based on her history and mitigation evidence presented to the Board, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that no discipline be imposed on QUEEN E. PAYTON in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 17-132, concluding that QUEEN E. PAYTON of **206MOUNT LAUREL , who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2001, should not be disciplined for violating RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21-6 (recordkeeping violations), based on her history and mitigation evidence presented to the Board, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that no discipline be imposed on QUEEN E. PAYTON in this matter.

In re Payton, 183 A.3d 946, 233 N.J. 205 (N.J. 2018).

Pincite

183 A.3d 946 (In re Payton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.